ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE JUDICIARY: EFFICIENCY AND CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS IN AUTOMATED DECISIONS

Abstract

This article analyzes the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (Al) in the Brazilian Juduciary, aiming to reconcile its use with the unconditional respect for the constitutional guarantees of a fair trial. The research addresses the tension between the benefits of Al for procedural efficiency and celerity and the ethical and constitutional risks arising from automation. Based on a methodology of bibliographic review and analysis of institutional experiences, the study examines how to ensure transparency, non-discrimination, and human oversight in automated decisions. The central hypothesis is that Al, although promising, can Only be Maintenance of effective human control, ensuring that technology serves as a support tool without replacing the jurisdictional function. The work proposes guidelines to reconcile technological innovation with the preserrvation of fundamental guarantees, aiming for a fair process in the digital age.