EDUCATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ACTIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF TEACHING

Authors

  • Taisa Barbosa Aguiar da Costa UNIP
  • Ana Carolina de Souza Tavares FASEC
  • Josiane Marins Ferreira Abreu Estácio de Sá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.26355

Keywords:

Educational Technologies. Student Autonomy. Active Methodologies.

Abstract

This article sought to analyze the implementation and impact of active methodologies and Digital Information and Communication Technologies (DICTs) in the contemporary educational context. The central objective was to identify how the integration of innovative strategies and digital tools can enhance the teaching-learning process, overcoming the traditional teaching model. The methodology used was qualitative bibliographic research, exploring case studies and literature reviews in databases such as Google Scholar and Scielo. The main results indicate that, although the perception of students and teachers regarding the use of technology is positive, there are significant obstacles related to technological infrastructure and the need for continuous teacher training. It was found that methodologies such as the flipped classroom and problem-based learning foster student autonomy and leadership. It is concluded that improving educational quality requires an integrated approach that combines institutional support, updating pedagogical practices, and developing socio-emotional skills to prepare students for the challenges of the knowledge society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Taisa Barbosa Aguiar da Costa, UNIP

Graduação: Pedagogia – UNIP.

Ana Carolina de Souza Tavares, FASEC

Graduação: Pedagogia – FASEC.

Josiane Marins Ferreira Abreu, Estácio de Sá

Graduação: Matemática – Estácio de Sá.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Costa, T. B. A. da, Tavares, A. C. de S., & Abreu, J. M. F. (2026). EDUCATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ACTIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF TEACHING. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.26355