ADMINISTRATIVE IMPROBITY: A LOOK AT BIDDING WAIVER PROCESSES BEFORE THE STATE OF PUBLIC CALAMITY

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutional principle of bidding, emphasizing direct contracting due to the declaration of a state of public calamity. His dismissal is based on article 24, item IV of Federal Law No. 8,666 of 1993. While it is appropriate to address understandings in the face of the imposition of a state of public calamity as the problem of Administrative Misconduct exercised by public agents, which violates Law No. 8,429 of June 2, 1992, which becomes a fundamental tool for the effectiveness of justice. The type of research adopted was the pure type (theoretical), using the subtype of bibliographic research, using documentary sources and jurisprudence. As there is great wealth directed, especially by the government and with that, the lack of transparency, the administrative improbity emphasized a new form of accountability, extirpating and remedying dishonest conduct and administrative malpractice. It was concluded that the State must control and supervise the abuse of power and the intrusion of the law, protecting the patrimony that is destined for civil society and avoiding delays, difficulties and administrative obstacles.