QUALITY OF LIFE OF WOMEN WITH PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE WHO ATTEND A FAMILY HEALTH CENTER IN THE EASTERN ZONE OF MANAUS – AMAZONAS

Authors

  • Nilza Duarte Farias UFRN
  • Grácia Maria de Miranda Gondim EPSJV/FIOCRUZ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i2.24212

Keywords:

Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Women's Quality of Life. Discourse of the Collective Subject.

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the perception of quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treated at a Family Health Unit (USF) in the East Zone of Manaus-AM. A cross-sectional, descriptive, and exploratory study was employed, with a mixed, quantitative-qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out using the Citizen's Electronic Medical Record, selecting a non-probabilistic and intentional sample of 25 women with POP. A semi-structured questionnaire was applied, and a conversation circle was held with 9 participants, allowing for personal narratives about their experiences. The results revealed that women with POP have low quality of life and a higher risk of physical, mental, social, and work-related complications. Symptoms such as urinary incontinence and a sensation of heaviness or vaginal pressure were strongly associated with impairments in well-being. The findings allowed for an understanding of the perception of the women treated and point to the need for strategies aimed at improving quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nilza Duarte Farias, UFRN

Mestre em saúde coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte- UFRN.

Grácia Maria de Miranda Gondim, EPSJV/FIOCRUZ

Pesquisadora titular III em saúde pública, EPSJV/FIOCRUZ, laboratório de educação profissional em vigilância em saúde, Drª. em ciência da saúde.  

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

Farias, N. D., & Gondim, G. M. de M. (2026). QUALITY OF LIFE OF WOMEN WITH PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE WHO ATTEND A FAMILY HEALTH CENTER IN THE EASTERN ZONE OF MANAUS – AMAZONAS. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i2.24212