PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED AT THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF RORAIMA IN THE AGRONOMY COURSE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACADEMICS ON EVALUATION METHODS, CORRELATED TO THE TEXT “IS IT POSSIBLE TO IMPROVE EVALUATION AND TRANSFORM IT INTO A KNOWLEDGE TOOL?” BY SUSANA CELMAN

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article sought to discuss the problems experienced by academics of the agronomy course at the Universidade Estadua de Roraima in the issue of evaluations, seeking to listen to academic reports in order to provide a report with positive and negative points that can provide basic but important data for teachers of the course under study can maintain, improve and prioritize its techniques so that the assessment of the academics is in fact something serious, well prepared and efficient in the matter of being able to capture in its entirety the knowledge acquired by the students, in addition to understanding and placing the evaluation as well. as a form of learning and not only as a strict form of approval or disapproval, but above all that can be diverse, varied and effective. The study was carried out through a conversation circle between the researcher and the academics with pre-prepared questions and based on a previous study carried out by researcher Susana Celman presented in the text “It is possible honey improve the evaluation and transform it into a knowledge tool” The conclusion reveals that the academics' reports fits with Susana Celman's base text, where one cannot use equal evaluation methods among unequals, showing that reality and adaptability as well as the social, psychological and physical characteristics of the students are different, which requires different forms and methods from the teacher in the evaluation, allowing everyone to show what they have learned during each subject.