BRAZIL'S STRATEGIC POSITIONING IN THE NEW GEOPOLITICAL ARRANGEMENT: PLURILATERAL BLOCS AND THE RISE OF EMERGING ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Elzio Barbosa Rodrigues FATEC Zona Leste
  • Gustavo Tonon Lopes Zona Leste São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i6.27695

Keywords:

Geopolitics. Brazil. Emerging Countries. Geoeconomics.

Abstract

This article analyzes Brazil's strategic role in the reconfiguration of contemporary international relations, characterized by the transition from a unipolar order to a complex multipolarity. The focus lies on investigating how the country positions itself regarding the phenomenon of regionalism and the consolidation of plurilateral blocs. The research employs the concepts of autonomy through diversification and soft power to evaluate opportunities derived from the rise of emerging economies, emphasizing the BRICS+ bloc. Through a qualitative bibliographic review and geoeconomic analysis, the study examines how Brazil can capitalize on its comparative advantages in food and energy security to negotiate more favorable terms in global value chains. Preliminary results suggest that Brazil’s sovereign integration depends on a diplomacy that balances economic pragmatism with leadership in South-South cooperation forums. It concludes that strengthening partnerships with the Global South acts as a risk mitigation mechanism in the face of current geoeconomic fragmentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elzio Barbosa Rodrigues, FATEC Zona Leste

Aluno da Faculdade de Tecnologia em Comércio Exterior /Zona Leste São Paulo – SP.

Gustavo Tonon Lopes, Zona Leste São Paulo

Professor da Faculdade de Tecnologia/Zona Leste São Paulo-SP. Mestre em Integração da América Latina e Relações Internacionais/USP.

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Rodrigues, E. B., & Lopes, G. T. (2026). BRAZIL’S STRATEGIC POSITIONING IN THE NEW GEOPOLITICAL ARRANGEMENT: PLURILATERAL BLOCS AND THE RISE OF EMERGING ECONOMIES. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i6.27695