THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE MUNICIPAL GUARD AS A PUBLIC SECURITY BODY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE STF AND STJ DECISIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i5.27329Keywords:
Municipal Guard. Public Security. ADPF 995. Constitutionalization. Unified Public Security System (SUSP). Supreme Federal Court (STF) / Superior Court of Justice (STJ).Abstract
This article aims to analyze the evolution of the legal status of Municipal Guards (GCM) as decided and adjudicated in Brazilian courts, focusing on the transition from mere property surveillance agents to integral bodies within the public security system, legal uncertainty is presented as the central problem, arising over several years due to conflicts generated by differing interpretations between the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the Supreme Federal Court (STF) regarding the legitimacy of stops, personal searches, and in flagrante arrests carried out by the guard, regarding methodology, this article is based on a qualitative approach, employing bibliographic and documentary procedures, and using the deductive method to examine Article 144 of the Federal Constitution and related legislation, such as Law No. 13,022/2014 and Law No. 13,675/2018. The results indicate that ADPF 995, adjudicated by the STF, consolidated the constitutionalization of the Municipal Guard, recognizing it as an inseparable pillar of the Unified Public Security System (SUSP).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Atribuição CC BY