THE INEFFECTIVENESS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPRISONMENT IN THE BRAZILIAN PRISON SYSTEM

Authors

  • Natália Vitória de Oliveira Bomfim Faculdade de Ilhéus
  • Thyara Novaes Faculdade de Ilhéus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i8.27126

Keywords:

Imprisonment. Brazilian prison system. Rehabilitation. Penal execution.

Abstract

This work addresses the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of imprisonment in the Brazilian prison system, analyzing whether prison fulfills its functions of punishment, prevention, and resocialization of the individual. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of imprisonment in the Brazilian prison system, verifying whether imprisonment fulfills its purposes of punishment, prevention, and resocialization of the individual. Its specific objectives include: understanding the purpose of imprisonment in the Brazilian legal system; analyzing the main problems faced by the Brazilian penitentiary system; and identifying the factors that contribute to criminal recidivism. The research was characterized as qualitative in nature, developed through a literature review. Furthermore, it discusses the role of the State in guaranteeing the fundamental rights of the incarcerated person and the need for more efficient public policies aimed at the social reintegration of the convict. The study has a bibliographic and legal character, based on the Federal Constitution, the Penal Execution Law, and doctrinal understandings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natália Vitória de Oliveira Bomfim, Faculdade de Ilhéus

Discente do curso de Direito da Faculdade de Ilhéus, Centro de Ensino Superior, Ilhéus, Bahia.

Thyara Novaes, Faculdade de Ilhéus

Docente do curso de Direito da Faculdade de Ilhéus, Centro de Ensino Superior, Ilhéus, Bahia.

Published

2026-08-03

How to Cite

Bomfim, N. V. de O., & Novaes, T. (2026). THE INEFFECTIVENESS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPRISONMENT IN THE BRAZILIAN PRISON SYSTEM. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(8), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i8.27126