DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND REPUTATIONAL DISPUTE IN BRAZILIAN AGRIBUSINESS: TRANSPARENCY, TRACEABILITY, AND STORYTELLING WITH YOUNG URBAN AUDIENCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.25678

Keywords:

Corporate reputation. Storytelling. Transparency. Agribusiness. Digital marketing.

Abstract

This article examines the reputational dispute surrounding Brazilian agribusiness among urban youth, focusing on the interplay between transparency, traceability, and digital storytelling. Based on a qualitative approach and a comparative analysis of public cases (2023–2025), the study draws on Social Media Engagement Theory and the concept of corporate reputation to analyze communication strategies within the sector. The findings suggest that reputational effectiveness does not stem from isolated elements, but from the integration of verifiable evidence, technological mediation, and narrative construction. The article proposes the concept of evidence-based narrative as an analytical framework to understand communicational legitimacy in digital environments marked by distrust. It contributes to the field by articulating cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions of engagement within a model applied to Brazilian agribusiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Celso Assis, IDP

Mestrando em Comunicação Digital pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino, Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa (IDP). 

Edwaldo Costa, IDP

Coordenador do Mestrado em Comunicação Digital do IDP, Doutor em Comunicação e Semiótica pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP), Pós-Doutor em Jornalismo pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP) e em História pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Pesquisador Colaborador do CEAM/UnB.  

Published

2026-04-16

How to Cite

Assis, C., & Costa, E. (2026). DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND REPUTATIONAL DISPUTE IN BRAZILIAN AGRIBUSINESS: TRANSPARENCY, TRACEABILITY, AND STORYTELLING WITH YOUNG URBAN AUDIENCES. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.25678