ASYMMETRY OF INCENTIVES FOR DEPLOYMENT IN PUBLIC SECURITY IN THE INTERIOR OF AMAZONAS: MANAGERIAL IMPACTS AND THE SEARCH FOR MATERIAL EQUALITY

Abstract

Public security in the State of Amazonas faces the structural challenge of extreme logistical isolation, aggravated by severe climate vulnerabilities that drastically raise the cost of living in inland municipalities. This article aims to analyze, from the perspective of Administrative Law, the legal asymmetry in territorial compensation policies between the Civil Police (PCAM) and the Military Police of Amazonas (PMAM). This is a qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive study based on a documentary review, cross-referencing state and federal legal frameworks with administrative doctrine. The results show that while PCAM was granted a percentage-based and progressive geographic indemnity tied to the degree of isolation (propter loci), PMAM remains governed by a housing allowance with a fixed and static nominal value. The adoption of disparate normative treatments by the State for sister corporations, subjected to the same operational and territorial costs, constitutes a clear breach of the Principle of Material Isonomy. It is concluded that the current normative disparity compromises institutional equity and mischaracterizes the compensatory nature of the benefit. The study suggests restructuring the military allowance into an isonomic percentage-based model (10%, 20%, and 30%), inspired by the consolidated paradigms of PCAM itself, the federal Border Indemnity, and the State of Roraima.