THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAW NO. 12,318/2010 IN LIGHT OF THE CONTROL OF LEGISLATIVE FACTS AND PROGNOSES: BETWEEN JUDICIAL DEFERENCE AND THE PROHIBITION OF SOCIAL RETROGRESSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i8.20741Keywords:
Parental alienation. Constitutionality. Fundamental rights. Legislative prognoses. Social regression.Abstract
The article examines the constitutionality of Law No. 12.318/2010, which regulates parental alienation, in light of judicial control over legislative facts and prognoses. It discusses the law’s protective purpose regarding the fundamental right to family life and the healthy development of children and adolescents, as well as controversies in its practical application, including claims of misuse and rights violations. The analysis relies on the state’s duty to protect fundamental rights, the principle of proportionality, and the prohibition of social regression, emphasizing the limits of judicial review and the deference owed to legislative choices.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2025-08-21
How to Cite
Rocha, B. M. (2025). THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAW NO. 12,318/2010 IN LIGHT OF THE CONTROL OF LEGISLATIVE FACTS AND PROGNOSES: BETWEEN JUDICIAL DEFERENCE AND THE PROHIBITION OF SOCIAL RETROGRESSION. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(8), 2501–2530. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i8.20741
Issue
Section
Artigos
Categories
License
Atribuição CC BY