PROHIBITION AND MASS INCARCERATION IN BRAZIL: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DRUG POLICY

Authors

  • Cailane Dias Lisboa Paz UNITINS
  • Jaqueline de Kássia Ribeiro de Paiva UNITINS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19421

Keywords:

Prohibitionism. Impacts. Brazilian prison system.

Abstract

This article critically analyzes the impact of Brazil's prohibitionist drug policy on mass incarceration. It adopts a descriptive methodology, with a bibliographic and documentary review, using a qualitative and quantitative approach. In fact, based on the results obtained through the deductive approach, it is concluded that prohibitionism in Brazil is inefficient and has generated more serious consequences than drug use itself, resulting in repression against the poorest segment of society, the empowerment of criminal factions, as well as overcrowding in the country's prisons. The research adopts a mixed methodology, combining documentary analysis, literature review and statistical data to understand the characteristics of the incarcerated population and the impacts of repression on the use of illicit substances in the Brazilian penitentiary system. It is concluded that drug repression, in addition to being ineffective in reducing consumption, worsens social inequalities, strengthens organized crime and overloads the prison system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cailane Dias Lisboa Paz, UNITINS

Graduanda em Direito. Universidade Estadual do Tocantins- UNITINS, Dianópolis, Tocantins, Brasil.

Jaqueline de Kássia Ribeiro de Paiva, UNITINS

Doutora em Direito pela Estácio de Sá, mestre em Gestão de Políticas Públicas pela UFT, especialista em Direito Ambiental pela UNB e Ciências Criminais pela ATAME, professora na Universidade Estadual do Tocantins (UNITINS) lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6120840749623819

Published

2025-05-20

How to Cite

Paz, C. D. L., & Paiva, J. de K. R. de. (2025). PROHIBITION AND MASS INCARCERATION IN BRAZIL: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DRUG POLICY. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(5), 4990–5005. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19421