METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF INVERSE FUNCTIONS: A REALITY IN SECONDARY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i10.21684Keywords:
Function. Inverse Function.Abstract
The research intention arises from the need to address a problem in the management of the teaching and learning process. The study was developed under the title: Methodological Principles for the Determination of Inverse Functions: A Reality in Secondary Education. The motivation stemmed from the concern that there were uncertain situations regarding whether the inverse function of , defined from onto , should be expressed as or , or even , as found in various textbooks. This situation defines the research problem, namely: the existence of different notations for the inverse functions of . The objective is to clarify the misconceptions in determining inverse functions, showing that, given a function dependent on , its inverse also depends on . That is, if , its inverse is . Since is not the correct notation for the inverse of , another procedure is required. Starting from the general notation of a function , one substitutes with and with , obtaining , and then isolates in terms of , resulting in . Considering as the inverse of leads to errors in the process of obtaining the inverse function from . Thus, if is bijective, defined from onto , then is also bijective, defined from onto . Some authors also consider the inverse of to be , which generates a series of doubts and misconceptions among students, hindering their proper understanding of inverse functions. Therefore, a practical approach is required to resolve this problem.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Atribuição CC BY