THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 28 OF THE DRUG LAW AND ITS FACTUAL REPERCUSSIONS

Authors

  • Alexsandro Grall dos Reis Faculdade João Paulo II
  • Angélica Coutinho Silvano Faculdade Cenecista de Osório
  • Claudio Luis do Val Faculdade São Judas Tadeu
  • Cassandra da Luz dos Santos Lins Faculdade Estácio de Sá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.23799

Keywords:

Criminal Law. Constitutionality. Drugs. Decriminalization. Consumption.

Abstract

Actions involving drug users are common in forensic routine, as well as in police approaches. The discussion about the constitutionality of the crime of possession of drugs for personal consumption has always stood out in the Courts and in the academic environment. However, many of the demands related to article 28 of Law 12.343 / 06 do not reach their legal or social objective, corresponding to an undue and ineffective paternalism on the part of the state and, finally, it means a false protection of the society. In view of the basic principles since the promulgation of the Federal Constitution of 1988, according to which self-harm is not punished, which is why an urgent analysis of constitutionality and its textual compatibility with the criminal law is imperative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexsandro Grall dos Reis, Faculdade João Paulo II

Bacharel em Direito, Faculdade João Paulo II de Porto Alegre/RS.

Angélica Coutinho Silvano, Faculdade Cenecista de Osório

Bacharela em Direito, Faculdade Cenecista de Osório/RS.

Claudio Luis do Val, Faculdade São Judas Tadeu

Bacharel em Direito, Faculdade São Judas Tadeu de Porto Alegre/RS.

Cassandra da Luz dos Santos Lins, Faculdade Estácio de Sá

Bacharel em Psicologia, Faculdade Estácio de Sá de Porto Alegre/RS.

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Reis, A. G. dos, Silvano, A. C., Val, C. L. do, & Lins, C. da L. dos S. (2026). THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 28 OF THE DRUG LAW AND ITS FACTUAL REPERCUSSIONS. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i4.23799