ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE DUTY TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION: AN ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY IN LIGHT OF DUE PROCESS AND CNJ RESOLUTION 615/2025

Authors

  • Lucas Duarte Barbosa Universidade Federal do Amazonas
  • Hamilton Gomes de Santana Neto Universidade Federal do Amazonas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i6.26814

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence. Civil Procedure. Judicial Reasoning. Efficiency. Guarantism.

Abstract

This article analyzes the tension between the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the Brazilian Judiciary and the constitutional duty to provide reasoning for judicial decisions, as provided for in article 489, § 1º, of the 2015 Civil Procedure Code. The study investigates how screening and automation systems, such as Victor (STF) and Athos (STJ), impact the procedural efficiency paradigm in light of the guarantees of due process of law and CNJ Resolution 615/2025. The methodology consists of bibliographic and documentary research, based on the analysis of legal doctrine. It is concluded that, although AI promotes speed and effective instrumentality, it cannot replace the value judgment and linguistic understanding required by exhaustive reasoning, under penalty of nullity of decisions and restriction of the adversarial principle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lucas Duarte Barbosa, Universidade Federal do Amazonas

Acadêmico de Direito na Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). 

Hamilton Gomes de Santana Neto, Universidade Federal do Amazonas

Orientador. Doutorando em Direito Ambiental na Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (UEA). Doutorando em Função Social do Direito pela Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP). Mestre em Constitucionalismo e Direitos na Amazônia pela Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). Especialista em Direito Processual pela Escola Superior da Magistratura do Amazonas (ESMAM). Professor de pós-graduação da ESMAM. Professor substituto na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM). 

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Barbosa, L. D., & Santana Neto, H. G. de. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE DUTY TO PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION: AN ANALYSIS OF ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY IN LIGHT OF DUE PROCESS AND CNJ RESOLUTION 615/2025. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i6.26814