NUTRITIONAL EFFICIENCY IN DOGS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN SUPER PREMIUM DOG FOOD AND NATURAL FEEDING

Abstract

This study addresses the topic of nutritional efficiency in dogs, comparing two feeding methods widely used in contemporary veterinary practice: super premium dog food and natural feeding. In this context, the central problem guiding the investigation arises: which of these two strategies presents greater nutritional efficiency and a better impact on the overall health of dogs? To answer this question, the general objective was defined as a comparative analysis of both methods. Specific objectives included: identifying their main nutritional characteristics; evaluating the advantages, limitations, and clinical implications of using each approach; and presenting a comparison based on recent scientific studies related to canine feeding management. To achieve these goals, a methodology based on an integrative literature review was adopted, involving the selection of scientific articles, nutritional guidelines, and comparative studies published in the last ten years, searched in databases such as PubMed, SciELO, and ScienceDirect using descriptors relevant to canine nutrition. The results found in the literature indicate that both super premium kibble and natural feeding are capable of promoting adequate health and meeting the physiological needs of dogs when correctly formulated and monitored by qualified professionals. However, relevant differences are observed between them regarding digestibility, nutrient bioavailability, palatability, microbiological risks, and variability in food composition. Thus, the findings reinforce that the choice between modalities should consider the individual profile of the animal, the conditions and expectations of the owner, and adequate technical guidance, allowing the identification of the most efficient, safe, and coherent option for each clinical context.