LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE ABSENCE OF A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS OR FORFEITURE PERIOD FOR FILING AN ACTION FOR THE DIVISION OF ASSETS AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF A DE FACTO UNION

Authors

  • Tatiana Mara Gualberto Czovny Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus
  • Ney Alexandre Lima Lira Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i11.22237

Keywords:

Common-law marriage. Division of assets. Legal certainty.

Abstract

This article aims to analyze some legal consequences of the absence of a statute of limitations or forfeiture period for filing an action for the division of assets after the dissolution of a stable union. The study is based on STJ (Superior Court of Justice) Information Bulletin No. 824, which demonstrates that the division of assets is a potestative right that is not subject to prescription or forfeiture, and may be requested at any time by one of the former partners. The study aims to demonstrate the understanding of the Brazilian legal system in the face of conflicts such as this, aiming at the legal security of the parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tatiana Mara Gualberto Czovny, Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus

Graduanda do Curso de Direito do Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus – CEULM/ULBRA/Manaus, AM. 

Ney Alexandre Lima Lira, Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus

Professor Especialista, orientador do Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso do Curso de Direito do Centro Universitário Luterano de Manaus – CEULM/ULBRA/Manaus, AM. 

Published

2025-11-17

How to Cite

Czovny, T. M. G., & Lira, N. A. L. (2025). LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE ABSENCE OF A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS OR FORFEITURE PERIOD FOR FILING AN ACTION FOR THE DIVISION OF ASSETS AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF A DE FACTO UNION. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(11), 5012–5023. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i11.22237