PSYCHOPEDAGOGY AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES: IMPACTS ON THE LEARNING PROCESS

Authors

  • Antonio Cesar Aielo UNIARA
  • Fabrício Augusto Correia da Silva UNIFESP
  • Emerson Aparecido Augusto UFSCAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19252

Keywords:

Psychopedagogy. Educational Technologies. TDICs. Digital Inclusion. Learning.

Abstract

This article analyzes how psychopedagogy can integrate educational technologies to improve the learning process. Initially, it discusses the benefits of Digital Information and Communication Technologies (DICTs), which promote a more dynamic and inclusive education. It then identifies effective psychopedagogical practices, such as the use of educational software and assistive technologies, as well as strategies for training educators in the ethical and reflective use of these tools. The study highlights challenges, such as inequalities in access and the need for teacher training, proposing solutions to overcome these barriers. It is concluded that the psychopedagogue plays an essential role in mediating between technology and education, contributing to the formation of critical and autonomous citizens, prepared for the challenges of the digital society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio Cesar Aielo, UNIARA

Mestre em Educação pela Universidade de Araraquara – UNIARA, Professor na Etec Anna de Oliveira Ferraz.

Fabrício Augusto Correia da Silva, UNIFESP

Doutor em Educação pela Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP, Professor de Educação Básica I junto à Prefeitura Municipal de Jaboticabal-SP.

Emerson Aparecido Augusto, UFSCAR

Doutorando em Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade pela UFSCAR e Mestre em Educação pela Universidade de Araraquara – UNIARA, Professor na Etec Anna de Oliveira Ferraz.

 

 

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

Aielo, A. C., Silva, F. A. C. da, & Augusto, E. A. (2025). PSYCHOPEDAGOGY AND EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES: IMPACTS ON THE LEARNING PROCESS. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(5), 3634–3644. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19252