LEGAL LANGUAGE AS AN OBSTACLE TO JUSTICE: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Heitor Paulo Holanda Bispo Pinheiro Rodrigues UNITINS
  • Antônio César Mello UNITINS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19036

Keywords:

Legal language. Accessibility. Justice. Social inclusion. Communication.

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between language and Law, highlighting how legal language, characterized by complex structures and technical terms, can hinder access to justice and compromise equality and transparency as enshrined in the Constitution. The study explores how "legalese" functions as a barrier to social inclusion, limiting the understanding and participation of much of the population in legal processes. Furthermore, the text analyzes recent initiatives aimed at simplifying legal communication through the adoption of plain and accessible language, with the goal of creating a more inclusive and democratic system. The conclusion emphasizes the need to restructure legal language as a tool for accessibility, ensuring greater clarity and effectiveness in the application of Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Heitor Paulo Holanda Bispo Pinheiro Rodrigues, UNITINS

Acadêmico do curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Tocantins – UNITINS.

Antônio César Mello, UNITINS

Professor, Orientador. Pós-graduado em Direito e Estado pela Universidade Vale do Rio Doce- UNIVALE e em Educação, Protagonismo e Propósito de Vida pela UNIUBEC. Bacharel em direito pelo Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis-UniRitter. Professor na Universidade Estadual do Tocantins, no Centro Universitário Católica do Tocantins e na Uninassau/Palmas. Ciências do Meio Ambiente pela Universidade Federal do Tocantins. Advogado. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7715210743705511. 

Published

2025-05-13

How to Cite

Rodrigues, H. P. H. B. P., & Mello, A. C. (2025). LEGAL LANGUAGE AS AN OBSTACLE TO JUSTICE: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(5), 2930–2946. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i5.19036