CONSUMPTION OF MEDICINES BY STUDENTS TO COPE WITH EVERYDAY LIFE AT UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Gilberto Leocadio de Lima Filho UFBA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i3.18324

Keywords:

Medicines. University students. Mental helath. Anxiety.

Abstract

Background. The aimed research to invastigate the relationship between medicine consumption by university students and possible sociocultural factors, outlining the profile of students and classsifying the main causes that lead to use. Methods. This is descriptive and analytical research, with a quantitative and qualitative approach. The use of statistical data was calculated by SPSS software. A survey was administered in person with direct questions  and other open questions that were transcribed, classified and typed into categories. Results. Almost half of students use medication to cope day-to-day life at university. Analgesics, stimulants, herbal medicines and muscle relaxants were the main medications. These have been used to mitigate symptoms of emotional tensions experiencied in the university environment. The main reasons that led students to use medication: 30% were anxiety and stress, 26,9% were pain, 14,4% were demands of the university such as charges, exams and classes, 10,6% were insomnia and sleep disorders. Conclusion. The consumption of madicines to cope with everyday life at university is na indicator of the physical and mental health conditions for university students. It was possible demonstrate that emotional tensions are directly or indirectly related to the problems of the university and its sócio-cultural context.

Downloads

Author Biography

Gilberto Leocadio de Lima Filho, UFBA

Professor titular da Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. Psicólogo, com mestrado e doutorado em ciências sociais pela Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA.

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

Lima Filho, G. L. de. (2025). CONSUMPTION OF MEDICINES BY STUDENTS TO COPE WITH EVERYDAY LIFE AT UNIVERSITY. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(3), 382–400. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i3.18324