JURY COURT AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PROVISIONAL EXECUTION OF THE SENTENCE

Authors

  • Sérgio Felipe Oliveira Rodrigues UNITINS
  • Yuri Anderson Pereira Jurubeba UNITINS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i2.18265

Keywords:

Jury court. Execution. Provisional. Pity. Constitutionality.

Abstract

Law 13,964/2019 amended art. 492, item I, paragraph “e” of the Code of Criminal Procedure, establishing as a rule the early execution of sentences in the case of conviction to a sentence equal to or greater than fifteen years. This legislative change revived the debate about the unconstitutionality of the provisional execution of the sentence, this time specifically in sentences handed down in the Jury Court. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the constitutionality of the provisional execution of the sentence. In methodology, it was a bibliographical review, based on scientific articles, books, periodicals, legal doctrines and jurisprudence. In the results, this change is still the stage for different understandings. Part of the legal doctrine understands it to be a constitutional measure. However, the majority understand that the legislative change is unconstitutional, as it violates the principle of presumption of innocence and sovereignty of the verdict, enshrined in the Federal Constitution in art. 5th, item LVII.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sérgio Felipe Oliveira Rodrigues, UNITINS

Graduando do Curso de Direito, Universidade Estadual do Tocantins - UNITINS.

Yuri Anderson Pereira Jurubeba, UNITINS

Doutorando em Direito pela Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro(PUC-RIO) e professor da Universidade Estadual do Tocantins. Lattes ID: 0195764455809614.

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Rodrigues, S. F. O., & Jurubeba, Y. A. P. (2025). JURY COURT AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE PROVISIONAL EXECUTION OF THE SENTENCE. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(2), 2439–2451. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i2.18265