THE CLAIM OF NON-COMPLIANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPT 976 AND THE WELFARE BENEFIT AS A PUBLIC POLICY FOR THE HOMELESS POPULATION

Authors

  • Vinicius Soutosa Fiuza Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP
  • Miguel Horvath Jr PUC/SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i12.12783

Keywords:

ADPF. Housing first. Aporophobia. Continued benefit. Overcoming homelessness.

Abstract

This article analyzes the possibility of using the social assistance benefit as a way out of homelessness, based on the Claim of Breach of Fundamental Precept (ADPF) 976. In conjunction with public policies that aim to ensure the right to housing first and other fundamental rights of homeless people and based on the three fronts established in the APDF as priorities and stages to be tackled for public policies aimed at homeless people, we will analyze how the social assistance benefit, guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, can be a way out of social vulnerability. We will also discuss the state's and society's aporophobia, which necessarily needs to be overcome in order to solve or mitigate the social problem that is the growth of the homeless population in our country, with the aim of bringing dignity to the people on the streets and seeking to eradicate poverty and reduce social inequalities.

Author Biographies

Vinicius Soutosa Fiuza, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP

Advogado, Especialista em Direito e Processo Previdenciário, Mestrando do Núcleo de Direito Previdenciário da Pontifícia Universidade Católica – PUC/SP.

Miguel Horvath Jr, PUC/SP

Doutor em Direito Previdenciário pela PUC/SP. Procurador Federal. Professor de Direito Previdenciário junto à Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Vinculado ao Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu (mestrado e doutorado).

Published

2024-01-16

How to Cite

Fiuza, V. S., & Horvath Jr, M. (2024). THE CLAIM OF NON-COMPLIANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPT 976 AND THE WELFARE BENEFIT AS A PUBLIC POLICY FOR THE HOMELESS POPULATION. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 9(12), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i12.12783