MARIA DA PENHA LAW: A HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY ANALYSIS OF ITS INEFFECTIVENESS

Authors

  • Maria Zuleika Calaça Silva Faculdade Única de Ipatinga
  • Mhardoqueu  Geraldo Lima França Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i11.12407

Keywords:

Domestic Violence. Women. Femicide.

Abstract

This article reflects on the context surrounding the issue of domestic violence against women, discussing Law No. 11,340/2006, which, in essence, provides a serious means of combat and punishment. However, in practice, its applicability has not yet been as effective as it should be, requiring extensive reflection and mobilization of competent authorities so that this law can truly achieve better efficacy, as research in Brazil indicates a growing number of cases of violence against women. This was a bibliographic review research, based on legislation and authors who discuss this subject. The study made it possible to verify that, despite the existence of many laws in favor of preventing and assisting women victims of violence, it is necessary to seek strategies that contribute to identifying numerous overlooked cases, enforcing existing laws rigorously, and strengthening public policies to transform the lives of women victims of violence.

Author Biographies

Maria Zuleika Calaça Silva, Faculdade Única de Ipatinga

Licenciatura em Letras pela Faculdade de Ciências Humanas do Sertão Central- Salgueiro/PE (1997), especialista em Direito Constitucional pela Faculdade Única de Ipatinga/MG (2021).

Mhardoqueu  Geraldo Lima França, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Graduado em Direito pela Faculdades Integradas do Oeste de Minas (2009). Mestre em Teoria do Direito pelo Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC - Minas (2015).

Published

2023-12-11

How to Cite

Silva, M. Z. C., & França, M. G. L. (2023). MARIA DA PENHA LAW: A HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY ANALYSIS OF ITS INEFFECTIVENESS. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 9(11), 2430–2442. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i11.12407