SPECIAL CIVIL COURTS OF THE BAHIA COURT OF JUSTICE; AN ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTIVITY IN THE LAST 3 YEARS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i10.12079Keywords:
Civil right. Judiciary. Bahia. Productivity. Law Suit.Abstract
This project aims to analyze the procedural productivity in the special civil courts in its last three years, addressing the application of its principles as well as the percentages for each month in the years analyzed, inquiring through analyzes carried out in the system of special courts, in their balances of judged/distributed processes, if it remains faithful to the purposes that justified its creation, such as, an alternative means for resolving conflicts of less complexity and low value for people with low conditions to move the common judicial machine, as well such as, analyzing the productivity and positions on the resolution of demands and judgments of the cities of Bahia in their respective courts. This body is guaranteed by the 1988 federal constitution, which aims to ensure full judicial protection, as well as, from a procedural point of view, to speed up the trial. The approach to this topic aims to analyze the productivity of cities in Bahia in processes governed by the aforementioned body and for this objective to be achieved, an exploratory methodology was developed based on Brazilian ordinary legislation and guiding principles of law 9,099/95, extracting statistical data collected by the Court of Justice of the State of Bahia in its production reports, checking materials within the systems of the special civil courts of Ilhéus, preparing graphs, such as which reflect the usefulness and fulfillment of the summary rite, which this body must follow, fulfilling the criteria of simplicity, celerity and informality, in order to analyze the discrepancies and highlights between the different cities analyzed in this article, highlighting the first ten in Bahia that stand out in terms of productivity in their respective years, through a verification of the Scale Judiciary, which is a parameter used to evaluate the performance of judicial provision calculated based on the number of cases judged and distributed in that period.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Atribuição CC BY