THE CRIMINAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREACHING A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT UNDER GERMAN LAW

Authors

  • Mateus Soares Litaiff UFAM
  • Rosberg de Souza Crozara UFAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i12.23023

Keywords:

Non-Prosecution Agreement. Absprache. Breach of the plea agreement. Legal consequences.

Abstract

This article analyzes the penal consequences arising from the breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, introduced into the Brazilian legal system by the Anti-Crime Package, Law No. 13.964/2019, in a comparative perspective with the German institution of Absprache. The study presents the historical context and normative evolution of both decriminalization mechanisms, examining their legal foundations, as well as the objective and subjective requirements necessary for their conclusion. The research highlights, above all, the legal and penal effects resulting from the violation of the clauses agreed upon in the ANPP, comparing them with the solutions provided for in German law. Finally, the work contributes to a critical understanding of the effectiveness and limits of these instruments of negotiated criminal justice, offering subsidies for the improvement of the Brazilian model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mateus Soares Litaiff, UFAM

Acadêmico de Direito da Universidade Federal do Amazonas UFAM.

Rosberg de Souza Crozara, UFAM

Orientador: Doutorando em Sistemas Penais e Direitos Humanos pela Universidade Federal do Estado do Pará (UFPA). Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNIESA). Especialista em Ciências Criminais pela Associação Educacional Unyahna (UNYAHNA). Professor de Direito Penal pela Universidade Federal do Estado do Amazonas (UFAM). Juiz de Direito do Tribunal De Justiça do Estado do Amazonas (TJAM).

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Litaiff, M. S., & Crozara, R. de S. (2025). THE CRIMINAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREACHING A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT UNDER GERMAN LAW. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(12), 1298–1312. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i12.23023