DISPUTAS TEÓRICAS NA ALFABETIZAÇÃO BRASILEIRA: MÉTODOS, CONCEPÇÕES DE LINGUAGEM E PRÁTICAS DE ENSINO

Authors

  • Alexandre Rodrigues de Castro CBS
  • Rozineide Iraci Pereira da Silva CBS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i3.24935

Keywords:

Literacy. Literacies. Teaching methods.

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the theoretical disputes surrounding literacy education in Brazil, focusing on the relationship between methods, conceptions of language, and teaching practices. The study followed a qualitative bibliographic approach, based on the systematization of academic publications and normative documents on literacy, literacies, and public policies. The results indicated that the debate is often structured around recurring polarizations, especially between more systematic approaches and perspectives that emphasize the social uses of reading and writing, although school practices are frequently hybrid. The analysis also showed that different conceptions of language (as a code or as social interaction) guide didactic choices and shape the roles of teachers and students in learning to read and write. It is concluded that improving the debate requires overcoming oversimplifications and strengthening teacher autonomy by combining explicit instruction of the writing system with meaningful reading and writing practices, while considering the impact of educational policies on everyday school life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alexandre Rodrigues de Castro, CBS

Doutorando em Ciências da educação, Universidade: Christian Business School-CBS.

Rozineide Iraci Pereira da Silva, CBS

Orientadora: PhD. Doutora em Ciências da educação pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas-UFAL, professora orientadora da Christian Business School-CBS.

Published

2026-03-12

How to Cite

Castro, A. R. de, & Silva, R. I. P. da. (2026). DISPUTAS TEÓRICAS NA ALFABETIZAÇÃO BRASILEIRA: MÉTODOS, CONCEPÇÕES DE LINGUAGEM E PRÁTICAS DE ENSINO. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 12(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i3.24935