COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN ROBOTIC, LAPAROSCOPIC AND RETROPUBIC SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Authors

  • Lucas Suzuki Ono UNILAGO
  • Pedro Henrique Ziquinatti UNILAGO
  • Fabrício Augusto de Oliveira Barbosa UNILAGO
  • Gabriel Gustavo dos Santos UNILAGO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i10.21559

Keywords:

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy. Robotic Surgery. Laparoscopic. Retropubic.

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in older men, often requiring surgical intervention when medical treatment fails. This study compares three surgical techniques: retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic. Retropubic surgery is effective for large prostates but is associated with higher morbidity. Laparoscopic surgery offers shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, but requires greater expertise. Robotic surgery, despite its high cost, provides faster recovery and better functional outcomes. The choice of technique should consider the patient's profile, prostate volume, and available resources, highlighting the need for investment in technology and training to expand access to minimally invasive approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lucas Suzuki Ono, UNILAGO

UNILAGO.

Pedro Henrique Ziquinatti, UNILAGO

UNILAGO.

Fabrício Augusto de Oliveira Barbosa, UNILAGO

UNILAGO.

Gabriel Gustavo dos Santos, UNILAGO

UNILAGO.

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Ono, L. S., Ziquinatti, P. H., Barbosa, F. A. de O., & Santos, G. G. dos. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN ROBOTIC, LAPAROSCOPIC AND RETROPUBIC SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 11(10), 2185–2192. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v11i10.21559