THE RISK TO SEPARATION OF POWERS: THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM

Authors

  • Ellen Cristina Pereira da Silva Faculdade Mauá
  • Francisco Cardoso Mendonça Faculdade Mauá
  • Poliana Pires da Silva Faculdade Mauá
  • Romário da Silva Melo Faculdade Mauá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i11.16770

Keywords:

Judicial activism. Democracy. Separation of Powers.

Abstract

This article aims to demonstrate the functions of each of the three branches of the Union, demonstrating the importance of remaining independent and harmonious with each other, as determined by the Constitution. It discusses the concept of judicial activism, highlighting its characteristics and consequences in the contemporary scenario, exposes how judicial activism can contribute to the current legal insecurity, bringing risks to democratic legitimacy by externalizing the non-observance of the separation of powers. The work was prepared based on bibliographic research, which is a form of research based on a work consultation made by third parties.

348 536

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ellen Cristina Pereira da Silva, Faculdade Mauá

    Acadêmica do curso de Direito da Faculdade Mauá.

  • Francisco Cardoso Mendonça, Faculdade Mauá

    Mestre em Educação, UGF - Universidade Gama Filho, Professor Faculdade Mauá de Goiás.

  • Poliana Pires da Silva, Faculdade Mauá

    Acadêmica do curso de Direito da faculdade Mauá.  

  • Romário da Silva Melo, Faculdade Mauá

    Acadêmico do curso de Direito da Faculdade Mauá.

Published

2024-11-13

How to Cite

Silva, E. C. P. da, Mendonça, F. C., Silva, P. P. da, & Melo, R. da S. (2024). THE RISK TO SEPARATION OF POWERS: THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 10(11), 2962-2970. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i11.16770

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1-10 of 50

Similar Articles

1-10 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.