TAX ATTORNEY OF THE MUNICIPALITIES: TAX BUREAUCRACY X ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY FOR BETTER COLLECTION

Authors

  • Wiliam Roma Oliveira Faculdade de ilhéus
  • Gilvan Tavares Gonzaga Faculdade de ilhéus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i5.10071

Keywords:

Collection. Efficiency. Bureaucracy.

Abstract

This article sought to discuss the performance of municipal tax attorneys in the context of tax collection. Although these institutions are important for the effectiveness of municipal tax collection, they face challenges related to bureaucracy and administrative efficiency. Tax bureaucracy can make the work of tax prosecutors difficult, as they often have to deal with complex and lengthy legal processes. In addition, the lack of investment in technology and training of public servants may impair the administrative efficiency of these institutions, negatively affecting the collection of municipalities, which already largely need transfers of funds from the states and the Union. There are measures to improve the performance of municipal tax attorneys, such as the simplification of tax procedures, the implementation of computerized systems and the training of civil servants. These measures can contribute to increasing the administrative efficiency of tax attorneys' offices and, consequently, to better tax collection by Brazilian municipalities.

Author Biographies

Wiliam Roma Oliveira, Faculdade de ilhéus

Aluno da faculdade de ilhéus, 9° Semestre. 

Gilvan Tavares Gonzaga, Faculdade de ilhéus

Possui graduação em ciências econômicas pela Federação das Escolas Superiores de Ilhéus e Itabuna (1977); especialização a nível de pós-graduação em Administração Pública Municipal no Instituto Brasileiro de Administração Municipal-IBAM, Rio de Janeiro em 1978; Mestre em Ciencias da Educação.

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Oliveira, W. R., & Gonzaga, G. T. (2023). TAX ATTORNEY OF THE MUNICIPALITIES: TAX BUREAUCRACY X ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY FOR BETTER COLLECTION. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 9(5), 2916–2927. https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v9i5.10071