ATRAUMATIC TOOTH EXTRACTION AND ITS CLINICAL BENEFITS IN DENTAL PRACTICE

Abstract

 Introduction: Atraumatic tooth extraction brings together minimally invasive techniques aimed at removing teeth with less damage to bone and gum tissues, contributing to the preservation of the alveolar ridge and better conditions for healing and oral rehabilitation. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the main atraumatic extraction techniques and their clinical benefits, comparing them to conventional methods and considering their effects on tissue preservation and postoperative outcomes. Methodology: An integrative literature review with a qualitative approach was conducted using the PubMed and SciELO databases, including studies published between 2020 and 2026. Out of 60 records identified, 21 were fully assessed and seven were included in the final synthesis. Results: The findings showed a reduction in pain, swelling, bleeding, analgesic use, and healing time, as well as greater patient comfort and better tissue preservation. The periotome showed advantages in simple extractions, while piezosurgery demonstrated benefits in more complex procedures, although it may increase surgical time. Conclusion: It is concluded that atraumatic extraction can improve clinical outcomes and support rehabilitation planning. However, its effectiveness depends on the technique used, the complexity of the procedure, and the patient’s clinical conditions, making it impossible to claim universal superiority of these approaches given the heterogeneity of the available evidence.